```html
Grand Jury Decisions in Ferguson and Staten Island: An Overview
Background
In 2014, within weeks of each other, grand juries in Ferguson, Missouri, and Staten Island, New York, made decisions that sparked national outrage and led to widespread protests.Ferguson, Missouri
In Ferguson, Missouri, a grand jury decided not to indict police officer Darren Wilson in the shooting death of Michael Brown, an unarmed Black teenager. This decision ignited protests and unrest in Ferguson and across the country.Staten Island, New York
In Staten Island, New York, a grand jury also decided not to indict police officer Daniel Pantaleo in the chokehold death of Eric Garner, another unarmed Black man. This decision also sparked widespread protests and led to calls for police reform.Impact and Legacy
The grand jury decisions in Ferguson and Staten Island had a profound impact on the national conversation about race, policing, and criminal justice. They also sparked a wave of activism and led to changes in police policies and practices. In Ferguson, the decision led to the creation of a new police oversight board and the adoption of body cameras by police officers. In Staten Island, the decision led to the passage of a law that requires police officers to use body cameras. The grand jury decisions in Ferguson and Staten Island also had a broader impact on the national discourse on race and policing. They helped to raise awareness of the issue of police brutality and the disproportionate impact of policing on communities of color.Conclusion
The grand jury decisions in Ferguson and Staten Island were watershed moments in the national conversation about race, policing, and criminal justice. They sparked widespread protests, led to changes in police policies and practices, and helped to raise awareness of the issue of police brutality. Although these decisions left many unanswered questions, they also sparked a movement for police reform and accountability. ``` 
Slate Com
Slate Com
Comments